Tag Archives: worst

WORST AIRBRUSHED BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

Baseball cards have long been a collectors item for both young and old fans alike. Sometimes card companies have taken liberties with how players are depicted on their cards. Over the decades, there have been many instances of cards being heavily airbrushed in ways that distort the truth. While airbrushing was a common practice for cosmetic reasons, some card companies took it too far resulting in some truly egregious alterations that misled collectors. Here are some of the worst offenders of doctored baseball cards through airbrushing.

One of the earliest and most infamous cases of airbrushing involved 1974 Topps rookie card of Dick Allen. At the time, Allen was a controversial figure in baseball who had friction with both fans and the media. Topps decided to take matters into their own hands and completely removed Allen’s Afro from his rookie card photo. They airbrushed his hair into a more conventional style, likely hoping to make Allen appear less threatening or counter-cultural to collectors at the time. The erasure of his distinctive natural hairstyle was jarring considering it was a key part of Allen’s look and image. It was simply shocking to see Topps alter his appearance so drastically through the technology of airbrushing.

A similar incident occurred with rookie cards of Ferguson Jenkins in 1963 and 1964. Topps decided Jenkins’s Afro hairstyle did not fit their desired aesthetic for baseball cards. So they airbrushed away his thick natural hair not once but twice on consecutive rookie cards. It was clear Topps was pushing a conservative agenda through their depictions of players, regardless of reality. This again demonstrated how airbrushing gave too much power to card companies to reshape identity and cultural expression. Both Allen and Jenkins lost important facets of their authentic appearances and style due to Topps imposing their own biased preferences.

Perhaps the airbrushing error that misled collectors the most was on the 1973 Topps card of Nolan Ryan. At the time, Ryan was emerging as one of the game’s hardest throwers and had just struck out 19 batters in a single game against the Tigers. His 1973 Topps card showed him with his leg stretched far back on the pitcher’s mound in an unnatural throwing motion that was clearly photoshopped. Topps decided to enhance Ryan’s windup for dynamic visual effect but in doing so, ended up depicting a movement he was physically incapable of. It completely distorted the reality of Ryan as a power pitcher and confused many about his true mechanics on the mound. This was Airbrushing taken to ridiculous heights just for superficial graphical impact with no regard for accuracy.

Instances of ethnicity erasure also occurred such as on the 1968 Topps card of Vic Power. Power was notably one of the few black players in the Major Leagues at the time. However, Topps lightened his skin tone significantly through airbrushing in an apparent attempt to downplay his race. It stripped Power of an important part of his cultural identity and heritage. Another example was the 1987 Donruss card of Ken Griffey Sr., where airbrushing lightened his skin tone as well while brightening other facial features. This disturbing pattern pointed to implicit, underlying biases at some card companies in how they selectively used airbrushing to minimize visible ethnic differences.

Sometimes card companies even used airbrushing to remove imperfections or temporarily alleviate injuries. The 1990 Upper Deck card of Bo Jackson, for instance,airbrushed away a visible lump on his forehead likely from a beaning or collision. On the 1985 Topps Traded card of Kirby Puckett, a small Band-Aid was erased from his nose via airbrushing to cover up a cut. While these touch-ups were minor compared to others, they still deviated from truthful portrayals of the players. The goal seemed more about crafting artificial perfection rather than documenting reality as it was.

By far, one of the most shocking uses of airbrushing occurred on the 1951 Bowman card of Joe DiMaggio. It depicted an injured DiMaggio with his arm held close to his body presumably due to a shoulder issue. However, Bowman decided to completely remove DiMaggio’s injured arm from the photograph using the new technology of airbrushing. It made him look like he had one arm amputated, in a bizarre manipulation that mystified many collectors for decades before the crude photoshopping was discovered. This example took airbrushing to the extreme in a misguided effort to mask an injury, but ended up distorting DiMaggio’s image in a frightening, almost science fiction-esque way.

While certain airbrushing helped improve cosmetic matters to varying degrees, some card companies clearly lacked restraint and oversight in their application of the technique. It allowed implicit biases and desires for superficial enhancement to dominate over accurately representing players. The extent of airbrushing occasionally crossed over into fake news territory by spreading misleading information. Some instances like DiMaggio‘s erased arm were just flat-out disturbing manipulations. It must be acknowledged that airbrushing was a norm at the time as a means to cover imperfections believed to distract the eye. Still, the worst airbrushed cards demonstrate how the lack of truth in depictions can undermine collecting value and mislead generations of fans.

Airbrushing was integral to the early mass production of baseball cards as a means to subtly improve images. Some companies took the cosmetic touch-ups too far by allowing preferences to reshape player appearance and erase cultural markers or even injuries at times. While intentions varied, the worst cases distorted reality in misleading ways. They demonstrated an overreliance on superficiality over truthful representation. Fortunately, advances in printing quality have diminished the need for heavy-handed airbrushing of baseball cards. But the most egregious examples from the past serve as cautionary tales of emphasizing optics over authenticity in sports depiction. When airbrushing goes too far, it can undermine the nostalgic collecting experience by distorting historical accuracy for generations of fans.

WORST BASEBALL CARDS EVER

Leave a reply

When it comes to collecting baseball cards, most enthusiasts seek out specimens featuring Hall of Famers, MVPs, Rookies of the Year, and other legendary players that exemplify the sport. For every well-known star featured on a classic card, there are plenty of lesser lights who had short careers in the majors and are now only remembered by their forgettable cardboard representatives. Over the decades, even the biggest card manufacturers like Topps, Fleer, and Donruss released myriad obscure players on tremendously underwhelming cards that are now considered by many to be among the absolute worst in the hobby.

One of the prime culprits for producing mediocre baseball memorabilia were the numerous regional and independent minor league card sets of the 1950s and 1960s. With no Major League licenses and limited photography budgets, these no-name brands often utilized poor quality team photos, generic stock images, or just plain terrible poses of anonymous balers. A perfect example would be the 1957 Visalia Oaks team issue set that is highlighted by deeply unflattering mugshots of future barely-there MLBers like Bob Lillis and Bob Sadowski on drab grey stock. Even more infamous were the 1961 Macon Peaches team issue cards that managed to make every player look utterly bored and disinterested in horrible trimmed close-ups.

Through the 1970s and 1980s, the influx of new card companies led to a glut of productions with subpar designs. Fleer’s early years resulted in strange vertical card formats like their infamous 1979 issue featuring obscure Angels hurler Dave Frost in mid-windup in a box that took up only half the normal horizontal space. Around the same time, rival Tacoma Studios generated head-shaking cards like their 1981 offering that put unknown A’s utilityman Mario Guerrero on a background featuring a horrendous deep sky blue pool graphic for no apparent reason. In the junk wax era, Donruss also tended to overproduce no-names to the point that their bland stylized portraits of pitchers like Tim Conroy and Mark Leonette on the 1987 set have become the butt of collector jokes.

While stars were usually featured tastefully, sometimes even the major brands missed the mark. Topps’ iconic 1952 set is mostly respected, but one card stands out for all the wrong reasons – featuring then Brooklyn Dodger Bobby Morgan in a criminally unflattering portrait that makes him look sullen with a lazy eye and bad haircut. Nearly as awkward was the infamous 1972 issue that saw Mets catcher Duffy Dyer inexplicably shot from below in a way that made his face look bloated twice its normal size. And who could forget Fleer’s misstep with their 1990 card depicting Mariners outfielder Greg Briley mid-swing in an ugly action shot where his torso is weirdly stretched out to an unnatural length.

Naturally, many of the all-time worst offender cards prominently feature players whose obscure names are now only brought up in conversations about baseball’s worst cards. One of the prime examples would be the 1968 Topps card of Minnesota Twins reliever Joe Grzenda, who went just 1-2 over parts of two MLB seasons. On his card, he is photographed from a low angle in the outfield grass which makes his cap look enormous, his face tiny, and his body out of proper proportion. Another notorious candidate is the 1976 Kellogg’s 3-D card of Cubs reserve outfielder Wayne Nordhagen, whose beady-eyed stunned facial expression staring at the viewer through the lenticular image is still off-putting decades later.

Some truly terrible baseball cards even went the extra mile to botch particulars beyond just the photography or design. Iconic brands like Topps are not above reproach here – their shocking 1985 blunder noticed astute collectors featured San Diego Padres veteran pitcher Ed Whitson’s stats from the previous season printed below Houston Astros pitcher Donny Moore’s photo on the card. Even more boneheaded was the infamous 1989 Fleer Traded release that swapped the images between Chicago Cubs pitchers Les Lancaster and Mike Bielecki on their respective cards while keeping the wrong names printed under each photo.

As the decades progressed, the move to glossier stock and photography made mistakes sometimes more subtle but no less cringe-inducing. Upper Deck gave Nationals outfielder Brad Wilkerson an awkward half-smile behind his batting helmet on their 2002 edition. In 2005, Topps captured Cubs third baseman Scott Moore mid-movement with an odd grimace on his face. Donruss liked putting players in pensive poses, but their 2008 choice for Royals shortstop Mike Aviles made him look distressed for some reason. And no self-respecting list of terrible baseball cards would be complete without mentioning the infamous 2009 Topps Update issue that featured David Eckstein seemingly saluting unseen genitalia with his batting glove-covered hand placement.

In the modern age of mass-produced baseball cards, it’s inevitable that some questionable photography and subject choices would make their way into the annual factory-line production runs from the major license holders. But it’s also a tribute to the enduring magic of the cardboard hobby that even the very worst examples somehow remain irresistible collectibles in their own culturally iconic way. No amount of dour expressions, bad cropping, or statistical mistakes can fully diminish the appeal of holding a tangible relic from any player who once stood on a Major League diamond, no matter how briefly or obscurely. In the end, the quirks and blunders that make some baseball cards especially awful are part of what gives them lasting charm and makes the pursuit of finding the most unusual specimens so enjoyably bizarre.

WORST BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

The worst baseball cards are often the lowlights of any collector’s collection. While every card released cannot be a rare gem, some cards through poor quality, terrible design choices, or other issues truly stand out as some of the worst ever made. Let’s take an in-depth look at some of these dud cards that card producers would probably like to take back.

One of the earliest misfires came in the late 19th century with the production of cigar box cards. These cardboard pieces featured baseball players of the day and were often included as prizes or incentives inside cigars. The crude production values and tiny thumbnail images resulted in murky, muddy pictures that are barely recognizable today. Names are often illegible and facial details non-existent, making identification near impossible without context of the period. These ambitious early efforts fell well short of what cards would become, but they get points for trying in the early days of collecting.

Jumping ahead several decades, one of the most mocked modern baseball cards derives from the infamous Fleer flare fiasco of 1981. In an ill-advised attempt to stand out, Fleer coated the fronts of cards with a peel-off “flare” sticker that was supposed to reveal a shiny player image underneath. In reality, the stickers peeled off messily, removing ink and leather texture from the cards. Lifting the stickers also dulled and damaged the revealed photo below. Making a flawed product even worse, the stickers contained toxic adhesive that “welded” to the paper. The resulting warped, fingerprinted, crumbling messes in collectors’ hands gave Fleer 1981 its reputation as one of the hobby’s biggest blunders.

In more recent years, production errors and glaringly bad photo/design choices have yielded some true clunkers. 2005 Upper Deck Walmart “Kmart” cards gained notoriety for a numbering error that repeated several players’ photo serial numbers, ruining the already underwhelming base set. But worse were 2011 Topps Update issues, which somehow passed muster with painfully awkward in-action shots, bizarre cropping, and players whose names were partially or entirely cut off at the bottom of frames. Even amateur photographers would struggle to turn in work that unpolished and shoddily done.

Gimmicky subsets have also blown up in producers’ faces on occasion. 2003 Fleer Greats of the Game fired a shot at collectors’ funny bones with headshot photos morphed onto everyday objects in unlikely poses. While intended in jest, the bizarre hybrid photos fell flat or came across as downright creepy more than humorous. 2009 Upper Deck Black Diamond offered an “In Action” subset described as “action shots encapsulating the intensity of the game” – but most ended up as tiny, indistinct blurs offering no discernible action whatsoever.

Perhaps no cards sting the pride of attached players quite like those featuring serious Photoshop errors or photo mismatches. 1992 Studio stuck Ozzie Smith’s head on somebody else’s body in a notorious mix-up. Doctors would have difficulty identifying the surreal body-head combination portrayed. 2000 Upper Deck broke new ground by pairing Angels slugger Mo Vaughn with a completely different athlete’s legs – believed to be linebacker Levon Kirkland. Attempts at creative ideas are understandable, but these glitches proved photo editing and fact-checking standards had slipped dangerously low.

Not all failures stem from production or design either – sometimes it’s the tiny details that make otherwise ordinary cards head-scratchers. 2004 Fleer Tradition posed Johnny Damon with a Royals cap – despite being long traded away from Kansas City. 1989 Topps traded Nolan Ryan’s distinctive eyebrows for a unibrow look nearly as infamous as his fastballs. And 2014 Topps Update immortalized Derek Jeter’s “Jeter Face” with a hilarious shot showing all five head positions at once. While chuckle-worthy, these kind of factual errors undermine a card at even the most basic information level.

As the hobby advances into new frontiers like memorabilia cards with game-used materials, more pitfalls await. Examples include relic cards with materials too minuscule to see, or cutouts Photoshopped to bizarre sizes and shapes. Luxury “1-of-1” cards wield immense eye-rolling potential when mistakes are made, such as Topps Transcendent mislabeling a Mike Trout card as belonging to Mickey Mantle. Getting expensive autograph or swatch cards “wrong” sticks out even worse than usual production errors too.

With rising parallel and short-print chase varieties flooding the hobby in modern years, it’s inevitable some will garner notoriety as duds or jokes. When collectors spend hundreds chasing hyper-premium variations, the last thing they want is more angst from yet another flawed or questionable card issuance. Quality control standards must remain vigilant as new frontiers are explored, or else the worst baseball cards are sure to keep being made. While humorous in hindsight, these cards remind producers and collectors alike that even in a multi-billion dollar industry, anything can still go wrong – no matter the era.

From cigar boxes to Flair fiascos, unfortunate gimmicks, Photoshop fails, and tiny overlooked details – baseball cards have seen their fair share of true clunkers over the decades. As the hobby endures, one thing is certain – there will always be more worst cards on the way, whether by accidental slip-up or outright product flop. Part of collecting’s appeal lies in reminiscing about the blunders as well as the beauties. And with each new blunder, we gain a new cautionary tale and source of amusement as the hobby marches ever forward.

WORST BASEBALL CARDS OF ALL TIME

Leave a reply

When it comes to collecting baseball cards, most collectors seek out rare and valuable vintage gems to showcase in their collections. For every highly coveted career-defining rookie card, there are plenty of terrible and worthless baseball cards that are better left buried in the backs of dusty shoeboxes. Some cards feature extremely poor photo quality, weird poses, or were mass-produced to the point of being worthless. This article will explore some of the worst and most notorious baseball cards ever produced in the hobby’s decades-long history.

Perhaps the cheapest and lowest quality baseball cards ever made were the infamous 1979 Topps baseball wax packs. These cardboard crackerjacks included extremely low-quality photos on thin, brittle stock that often cracked right out of the pack. The photos lacked sharp focus and looked like blurry, faded snapshots pulled from a disposable camera. Even at the time of release, these cards were seen as a steep decline in quality from Topps’ usually solid productions. To this day, in pristine condition one of these cards might fetch a quarter, if you can find a collector foolish enough to buy such an obviously poorly made item.

A more recent bottom-of-the-barrel release came in 1997 from Stadium Club. The base card design was fine, but some of the photo variations ventured into bizarro territory. For example, Cardinals catcher Tom Pagnozzi’s card featured an out-of-focus shot with his face half-cut off. White Sox pitcher James Baldwin’s image looked like a low-res yearbook shot blown up to card size. And most infamous was slugger Mo Vaughn’s incredibly blurry close-up that made him look like a background extra in a low-budget sci-fi movie. It seems these oddities slipped through quality control and into packs, cementing Stadium Club ’97 as one of the strangest sets ever created.

Very bad lighting and poorly chosen action shots have ruined plenty of cards over the years. A perfect example is Dodgers great Sandy Koufax’s 1969 Topps issue, which captured him in the middle of an awkward windup with his neck elongated like a proud giraffe. Rangers pitcher Edwin Correa’s bizarre 2000 Leaf card showed him falling down in mid-delivery, forever memorializing an embarrassing on-field face plant. And Diamondbacks hurler Brandon Webb earned a truly awful 2007 Topps card that caught him in the middle of a strained, pained facial expression that made him look like he was passing a kidney stone. These unfortunate photo choices turn all-time great players into short-lived baseball card jokes.

Perhaps no cards better exemplify the “so bad they’re good” category than the infamous 1986 Fleer Sticker cards. As the name implies, these were self-adhesive decals rather than the traditional cardboard. But that’s not the worst part. Each sticker encapsulated a crisp action shot about 1/3 the size of a standard card. The bizarre tiny images were then crammed onto a rectangle of blank white film with no stats, name, or team logo! While a novel concept, these failed critically as a viable collecting product and ended up in the bargain bins. Today, unpeeled specimens sell for under a dollar and are mainly sought out by collectors seeking campy oddities.

Mass produced chaff also dilutes the rare gems in baseball card sets. Among the most worthless commons ever made were the 1989 Donruss football-style action pics that merely captured players posed like generic football cards. Upper Deck in the 1990s really took this concept to an absurd new low by churning out base cards by the millions featuring bland team logo backgrounds and incredibly zoomed-out full body shots where faces were indistinguishable. Even rookies ended up essentially worthless in these bloated monopoly releases that flooded the secondary market. Less is definitely more when it comes to designing effective and attractive modern baseball cards.

While poor photography, weird portraits, and overproduction hurt the desirability of many cards over the decades, bad on-card autographs can ruin what should be a rare and valuable card. The infamous 2016 Topps Allen & Ginter Kevin Pillar autograph card stuck out like a sore thumb, as the slugging outfielder’s signature was a tiny, almost illegible scrawl crammed diagonally into the bottom corner. Arguably even worse was Cardinals pitcher Adam Wainwright’s 2014 Tier One autograph featuring an actual printed facsimile of his autopen-autographed note rather than a true hand-signed work of art. Autographs are best kept classy and avoid these questionable signed variants that undermine the rarity of the chasing autographed rookie cards.

While most collectors seek only the polished gems in their collections, digging through piles of poor quality, strangely posed, overproduced, or otherwise flawed cards can make for an entertaining trip down bizarre baseball card memory lane. Even the hobby’s mistakes over the decades provide lessons in quality control and design that elevated modern issues to finer pieces of collectible pop culture art. Some baseball cards from history are best left forgotten, representing the rare missteps that stand out as true embarrassments to the otherwise storied tradition of the cardboard pastime.