Tag Archives: happened

WHAT HAPPENED TO DONRUSS BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

Donruss baseball cards were first issued in 1981 by the Donruss Company and grew to become one of the top sports card brands alongside Topps throughout the 1980s and early 1990s. At their peak, Donruss baseball cards were among the most popular and valuable trading cards on the market. Several factors in the mid-1990s contributed to the eventual decline of Donruss baseball cards.

One major issue was overproduction and saturation of the market. In the early 1990s, the baseball card market was booming with collectors amassing huge collections and individual cards commanding high prices. Seeing the profits others were making, numerous new companies entered the baseball card industry in the early-mid 1990s. This resulted in a massive overproduction of cards with the existing companies like Donruss also increasing production substantially each year to try and gain more market share.

By 1994, the market was flooded with far more baseball cards than collectors had any demand for. Retailers were stuck with piles of unsold inventory they couldn’t move. Many collectors lost interest with so many duplicates clogging the market. With declining sales and revenues, it became untenable for many small companies to remain in business. The players’ union was concerned about all the unlicensed products bearing players’ names and statistics without compensation.

In response to the overproduction crisis, Major League Baseball entered into exclusive contracts in 1995 with only a few national baseball card manufacturers including Leaf, Upper Deck, and Fleer in addition to the long-time rightsholder Topps. Donruss and other smaller companies were shut out from any official MLB player licenses. Without being able to feature active major leaguers, Donruss baseball cards lost much of their appeal and collectibility.

Another factor was the increased dominance of the licensed sportscard market by a few big companies. In the early 1990s, Donruss was one of the “Big 3” along with Topps and Fleer. In 1995 Upper Deck gained the high-profile MLB license and quickly became the market leader with ultra-premium, higher-priced cards that focused more on memorabilia pieces. For collectors, Upper Deck cards were seen as cooler, more elite collectibles that made simple sticker baseball cards seem outdated.

Donruss attempted to stay competitive by shifting to focus more on parallels, inserts, and autographs to mimic the Ultimate Collection-style products from competitors. They struggled to gain shelf space at retail outlets that were maximizing space for the nationally-licensed brands. Distribution channels narrowed and Donruss were progressively squeezed out. By the late 1990s, Donruss had fallen far behind Topps and Upper Deck and were losing millions.

In late 1998, Donruss was acquired by publisher Phoenix Media/Communications Group, who already owned rival card manufacturer Fleer. Rather than competing brands, it made more sense financially to consolidate their card operations. The Donruss name and brand was officially retired after the 1999 season in favor of simply using the more commercially viable Fleer brand going forward for all of PMC’s baseball cards.

While occasional retro or nostalgia Donruss baseball card products have been released since by other companies who now hold the trademarks, the classic original Donruss run from 1981-1999 came to an end due to a combination of overproduction crashing the market in the mid-1990s and the inability to hold onto an official MLB player license, which proved fatal as the sportscard industry consolidated around just a handful of nationally licensed manufacturers who came to dominate distribution. This ultimately led to Donruss, one of the pioneering brands in the industry, being absorbed into another company and disappearing as an independently operating baseball card manufacturer.

WHAT HAPPENED TO BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

Baseball cards have had quite an interesting history in the latter half of the 20th century in America. Their popularity peaked during the late 1950s through the early 1970s as an affordable hobby for children and collectors. Several key events and trends led to a decline in their demand and status as a mainstream collectible in the following decades.

In the early post-war period of the late 1940s and 1950s, baseball began booming in popularity across the United States. More families were able to afford leisure activities and passions surrounding the national pastime blossomed. Major league baseball clubs saw this as an opportunity and began regularly including baseball cards in packs of chewing gum sold in local shops, pharmacies, and supermarkets. Kids eagerly awaited the release of the new sets each year containing cards of their favorite players and teams. The relatively low costs made starting a collection very attainable.

The boom experienced a downturn in the late 1980s and 1990s for a variety of intertwining reasons. The overproduction of cards watered down their value in the eyes of many collectors. Where sets used to include only one card per player, later issues from manufacturers like Topps had some star players represented by dozens of near-identical cards in a single year. Oversaturation damaged the exclusivity and mystique that made collecting so appeal.

Consumers had more entertainment options competing for their discretionary income as technology advanced. Cable television, video games, the internet, and other hobbies drew recreational time and dollars away from baseball cards. Younger generations also lacked the same connection to baseball that earlier audiences experienced while it was still America’s preeminent pastime. Without as strong an emotional link to the players and sport, the intrinsic worth of amassing cards decreased for many potential collectors.

Another major pitfall was speculation. In the late 1980s, intense media coverage and hype drove up rookie card prices to astonishing levels, enticing many to dive into the market purely as an investment scheme rather than appreciating it as a hobby. This speculation bubble spectacularly burst in the early 1990s, leaving many burned investors who soured on the collecting scene altogether. Although the most valuable vintage cards retained strong valuations, the average modern cardboard lost much of its projected worth.

The steroid era that engulfed baseball in the late 1990s and early 2000s eroded fans’ relationships with their heroes, questioning accomplishments and records. Scandals diminished how closely audiences connected to the larger-than-life players that were depicted on cards. Reports of performance-enhancing drug use changed perceptions of the game at a time the industry was already dealing with multiple challenges. While the ‘clean’ legends of the past retained immense reputations, modern players suffered damage to their legacies.

Simultaneously, changes in the broader sport reduced baseball card viability as an intrinsic utility and experiential novelty. After considering lawsuits about included gambling elements, Topps lost its exclusive deal with MLB players in the 1990s, opening the door for competition from companies like Upper Deck. This ended collectors’ dependencies on specific manufacturers and loosened psychological ownership feelings over particular sets. Expanded revenues fueled ever-larger player contracts and salaries, rendering their signed cards less unique or unusual.

While the industry never became defunct, revenues and collector engagement declined sharply from peak levels in subsequent decades. Nostalgia for childhood pastimes and increased incomes has seen recent rebounds, but baseball cards now sit as a quaint niche interest and investment area rather than a dominant all-ages pastime. Regulations have reduced gambling components in pack contents. Despite facing near-collapse, resilient collectors kept the tradition alive after overcoming major economic and cultural hurdles through the industry’s history.

Overproduction, speculation bubbles, competition from evolving technologies, damage to perceptions of players amidst scandals, changes weakening cards’ intrinsic worths, and shifting cultural priorities all weighed heavily in disrupting baseball cards’ mass market dominance from the late 20th century onward after their golden age peak. A dedicated community has ensured their continuity even with reduced overall relevance, guided by the nostalgia many still feel connecting back to simpler times.

WHAT HAPPENED TO UPPER DECK BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

Upper Deck was a pioneering baseball card company that revolutionized the hobby in the late 1980s and 1990s. Founded in 1988, Upper Deck quickly became the premier brand in the industry by utilizing cutting edge printing technologies, higher quality cardstock and card designs, and innovative marketing strategies. Several factors in the early 2000s led to the decline of Upper Deck’s baseball card business.

When Upper Deck first entered the market, they broke from tradition and chose to print their cards on a thicker, higher quality paper stock compared to competitors like Topps and Fleer. This gave their cards a superior feel and allowed for more detailed photographs and artwork. Upper Deck also embraced advanced printing technologies like multicolored lenticular cards that changed images when tilted. These production values attracted many collectors who felt Topps cards had become too cheaply made. Upper Deck’s exclusive agreements with star players to only sign cards for them also gave their sets more star power and popularity.

In the late 90s the baseball card bubble began bursting. Speculation and inflated card prices hurt the hobby. At the same time, the rise of the internet made it easier for collectors to buy, sell and trade cards outside of the traditional direct channels like hobby shops. This disrupted the distribution model the card companies relied on. Meanwhile, the players union began advocating that players should receive royalties from the resale of their autographed cards, cutting into company profits. The 1995 MLB player’s strike further damaged fan interest in the game and the card companies.

As the market contracted in the late 90s, Upper Deck overproduced sets hoping to maintain revenues. This led to a card crash as demand dried up but supply remained high. With so many versions and parallel prints being released, individual cards lost scarcity and value. Some collectors grew tired of having to frequently update team sets. At the same time, digital entertainment and the internet revolution were providing fans with new ways to engage with sports besides traditional card collecting. This marked a turning point as the baseball card market transitioned from a speculative bubble to a more stable specialty hobby.

In the early 2000s, Upper Deck took on large amounts of debt to finance expansion into other sports and entertainment licenses. These diversification efforts did not pan out financially. Meanwhile, Upper Deck’s baseball division was losing money and market share to competitors who were better adapting to the changing conditions. In 2001, the company filed for bankruptcy protection as its debt load became too large relative to revenues. After restructuring, Upper Deck emerged from bankruptcy but without the funds needed to properly support and market new baseball card releases.

Production issues also plagued Upper Deck in the 2000s, damaging collector confidence. Some sets had print quality defects, missing parallels, or short printed serial numbers that angered customers. With their brand reputation taking a hit, demand eroded further. By the middle of the decade Upper Deck’s baseball operations were unprofitable and became an afterthought compared to their mainstream sports licensing work. In 2008, Upper Deck sold off their baseball division to a new company called Leaf, which has since also struggled to gain traction in the market.

While Upper Deck baseball cards are still produced in smaller runs today, the company’s dominance has faded. The collector baseball card market is now much smaller and more specialized compared to the boom years of the 1990s that Upper Deck helped drive. Higher costs, less retailer support, more competition from online resellers, and younger fans engaged through new platforms have made it difficult for any company toachieve the scale and success Upper Deck once did. Their inability to stay lean and change with the declining conditions ultimately led to Upper Deck losing their place as the premier brand in baseball cards.

A combination of macroeconomic shifts, industry changes, production missteps, heavy debt loads, and the failure to properly pivot their business model resulted in Upper Deck falling from their throne as the leading force in the MLB card world. While still operating today, they have never regained their former glory in baseball cards – a fallen star brought down by the perfect storm of changing tastes, market forces, and financial troubles outside of their control. This marked a significant changing of the guard period for the entire baseball card market.

WHAT HAPPENED TO FLEER BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

Fleer was once one of the major manufacturers of baseball cards in the United States along with Topps and Donruss. However, Fleer went through some major business challenges and declines in the late 1990s and 2000s that ultimately led to them losing their MLB license and exiting the baseball card market.

Fleer began producing baseball cards in 1948 and was able to compete successfully with Topps for many decades. They obtained an exclusive license from MLB in 1981 which allowed them to be the only company producing baseball cards during that time period. In late 1987 Topps was able to regain its MLB license and re-entered the baseball card market. This led to a “card war” between Fleer and Topps through the late 1980s and early 1990s as both companies tried to one-up each other and recruit the best rookie cards and photography.

During this time period, Fleer was owned by Fleer Corporation which was a large manufacturer of chewing gum and trading cards. In 1992 the Fleer Corporation encountered serious financial problems and was purchased by Cardille Communications. Under new ownership, Fleer was able to continue producing baseball cards through the 1990s but faced new challenges from competitors like Upper Deck and Score who entered the market in 1989. These new companies pushed Fleer to the number 3 spot in baseball card market share behind Topps and Donruss.

As the 1990s went on, the baseball card speculative bubble that had driven massive interest and sales in the late 1980s started declining. Many retailers like Walmart and Target also stopped carrying baseball cards which significantly reduced Fleer’s distribution avenues. On top of that, Cardille Communications proved to not have the same expertise or dedication to the baseball card business that the original Fleer Corporation owners had. As a result, Fleer’s quality and design began to fall behind competitors.

In 1996, Cardille sold Fleer to Playmates Toys. However, Playmates did not have much experience or passion for the trading card industry. They focused more on achieving short term profits over long term brand maintenance. Under Playmates ownership, Fleer started cutting costs in dangerous ways like cheapening materials, eliminating premium hit chances for rare cards, and underproducing to save on printing costs. All of these decisions damaged Fleer’s reputation among collectors.

Through the late 1990s, Fleer lost more market share to Upper Deck who became the clear #2 brand behind Topps. Card quality continued to slip at Fleer which caused collectors to lose interest. In 2000 Playmates lost Fleer’s exclusive MLB player license to produce trading cards after the license expired and MLB awarded the license to just Topps starting in 2001.

Without the MLBPA license, Fleer’s demise in the baseball card world was sealed. They tried producing some cards using retired players from the 1990s but interest and sales were very low. In 2002, Playmates officially exited the baseball card market by selling off the remaining Fleer assets. Various attempts were made afterwards to restart Fleer but none gained much traction. So after over 50 years, Fleer was gone from the baseball card sector largely due to mismanagement under multiple parent companies in the 1990s that led to declining quality, reputation and ultimately the loss of the all-important MLB license.

So in summary, Fleer was once a major force but faced challenges from new competitors in the late 80s/early 90s. Ownership changes in the 1990s failed to properly invest in and maintain the brand, leading to quality declines. Ultimately the MLB license moved exclusively to Topps, ending Fleer’s long run of producing America’s pastime on trading card form after the turn of the 21st century. Many collectors today still look back nostalgically at the classic Fleer sets of the 1970s and 1980s before business struggles removed them from the baseball card industry.

WHAT HAPPENED TO SCORE BASEBALL CARDS

Leave a reply

Score was a brand of baseball cards produced by the Score Board Company beginning in 1951. They were the top competitor to Topps for many years as the two companies battled for dominance in the baseball card market throughout the 1950s and 1960s. By the early 1970s Score’s baseball card production was coming to an end as the company faced increasing challenges.

When Score first entered the baseball card market in 1951, they brought useful innovations like the inclusion of player statistics on the cards. This was a new development that made their cards more appealing to collector interests beyond just young kids. In their early years Score was also able to sign deals to use the likenesses of famous players like Mickey Mantle and Willie Mays, helping them compete with established brand Topps.

Through the 1950s Score was generally considered the “number two” brand behind Topps as the two companies split the baseball card production market. The 1960s would see Score face new competitive pressures. First, licensing regulations were established in 1961 that required companies to obtain individual player and league licenses to use names and likenesses on cards. This increased costs for all manufacturers.

Then in 1965, Topps outmaneuvered Score by signing exclusive multi-year deals with both major leagues that locked Score out of using team logos and league trademarks on cards. This was a major competitive blow, as Score cards from 1966 onward had generic team names rather than the real ones. With Topps dominating licensing, Score’s appeal and sales began declining steadily during the mid-1960s.

At the same time, Score faced rising costs to obtain individual player and league licenses each year instead of longer term deals. On top of this, the 1969 decision in a Milwaukee Braves case established players had rights to control use of their own images and stats, not just the leagues. This increased licensing costs further. Between competition from Topps and growing financial pressures, Score’s profitability was decreasing dramatically.

The decline continued through the early 1970s. Then in 1972, Score made the decision to stop producing baseball cards entirely and focus on other sports where they did not face the same dominance from Topps. That year’s Score issue would be their last involving baseball. Without access to league/team names or coveted rookie cards of future stars due to Topps’ exclusive deals, Score had little ability to effectively compete.

While Score would go on to produce cards for other sports through the 1970s, their abandonment of baseball cards in 1972 marked a major shift. It ended over two decades of their competition with Topps for dominance in the baseball card market. Score’s decision represented how escalating licensing costs due to new regulations, along with Topps’ exclusionary tactics, had created a non-competitive business situation driving Score from the baseball card segment.

With Score departing, Topps became the clear market leader in baseball cards and has maintained that position ever since through smart license management and new product offerings. Meanwhile, Score moved on to other sports but was never again able to recapture its past competitiveness against Topps in their original field of baseball cards. Their withdrawal paved the way for Topps to solidify as the premier brand in what remains a lucrative industry decades later, all stemming from regulatory changes and business practices in the late 1960s and early 1970s that marginalized Score.

Rising production costs from evolved player licensing requirements, exclusionary deals signed by Topps locking out usage of teams/leagues, and an inability to compete on equal footing with Topps due to these competitive pressures combined to force Score’s exit from the baseball card market in 1972 after over 20 years. It marked a major transition towards Topps’ long-standing dominance as the premier name in baseball cards.